Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Thermo Fisher manufactures this product
Structured Review
Thermo Fisher
apc cy7 cd45 1
Supplementary Figure 3A ). (A) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the thymocytes from BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells ( Donor ) in Dll4 f/f (Cont), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO) mice as the recipients ( Recipient ). Numbers in the profiles indicate the relative percentages, in CD45.1 + cells (left panels, CD19 vs. Thy1.2) and CD45.1 + Thy1.2 + cells (right panels, CD4 vs. CD8), for each quadrant or fractions. (B) Thymic cellularity (mean ± SD) of BM chimeric mice in Dll4 f/f (Cont, n=3), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO, n=3), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO, n=3), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO, n=3) mice is shown. There are no statistically significant differences found between control and Notch2 -deficient BM cells by Student’s t -test. Each closed circle indicates the number of thymocytes (CD45.1) in each mouse. (C) Representative CD21/CD23 profiles in the donor-derived B cells (CD45.1 + B220 + ) obtained from the spleen of BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells in Dll4 f/f mice are shown. The red polygons and numbers in the profiles indicate the MZB cell fraction and their frequencies. Results represent three independent biological replicates (A, C) . " width="250" height="auto" />
Apc Cy7 Cd45 1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and morehttps://www.bioz.com/result/apc cy7 cd45 1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc cy7 cd45 1 - by
Bioz Stars,
2026-03
86/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Dll1 Can Function as a Ligand of Notch1 and Notch2 in the Thymic Epithelium"
Article Title: Dll1 Can Function as a Ligand of Notch1 and Notch2 in the Thymic Epithelium
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.852427
Supplementary Figure 3A ). (A) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the thymocytes from BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells ( Donor ) in Dll4 f/f (Cont), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO) mice as the recipients ( Recipient ). Numbers in the profiles indicate the relative percentages, in CD45.1 + cells (left panels, CD19 vs. Thy1.2) and CD45.1 + Thy1.2 + cells (right panels, CD4 vs. CD8), for each quadrant or fractions. (B) Thymic cellularity (mean ± SD) of BM chimeric mice in Dll4 f/f (Cont, n=3), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO, n=3), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO, n=3), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO, n=3) mice is shown. There are no statistically significant differences found between control and Notch2 -deficient BM cells by Student’s t -test. Each closed circle indicates the number of thymocytes (CD45.1) in each mouse. (C) Representative CD21/CD23 profiles in the donor-derived B cells (CD45.1 + B220 + ) obtained from the spleen of BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells in Dll4 f/f mice are shown. The red polygons and numbers in the profiles indicate the MZB cell fraction and their frequencies. Results represent three independent biological replicates (A, C) . " title="... Notch2 f/f or Rosa26 CreERT2 Notch2 f/f mice (CD45.1) 1 week after the administration of tamoxifen. BM ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
Figure Legend Snippet: T-cell development from Notch2 -deficient BM cells in the thymus of iD4 and iD1 mice. Age-matched control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells were obtained from Notch2 f/f or Rosa26 CreERT2 Notch2 f/f mice (CD45.1) 1 week after the administration of tamoxifen. BM chimeric mice were prepared in irradiated (6 Gy) C57 BL/6 mice (CD45.2) with Notch2 -deficient BM and analyzed 4 weeks after the reconstitution ( Supplementary Figure 3A ). (A) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the thymocytes from BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells ( Donor ) in Dll4 f/f (Cont), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO) mice as the recipients ( Recipient ). Numbers in the profiles indicate the relative percentages, in CD45.1 + cells (left panels, CD19 vs. Thy1.2) and CD45.1 + Thy1.2 + cells (right panels, CD4 vs. CD8), for each quadrant or fractions. (B) Thymic cellularity (mean ± SD) of BM chimeric mice in Dll4 f/f (Cont, n=3), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO, n=3), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO, n=3), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO, n=3) mice is shown. There are no statistically significant differences found between control and Notch2 -deficient BM cells by Student’s t -test. Each closed circle indicates the number of thymocytes (CD45.1) in each mouse. (C) Representative CD21/CD23 profiles in the donor-derived B cells (CD45.1 + B220 + ) obtained from the spleen of BM chimeric mice with control (WT) or Notch2 -deficient (N2KO) BM cells in Dll4 f/f mice are shown. The red polygons and numbers in the profiles indicate the MZB cell fraction and their frequencies. Results represent three independent biological replicates (A, C) .
Techniques Used: Irradiation, Derivative Assay
Supplementary Figure 3B ). (A) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the thymocytes from the secondary BM chimeric mice. Numbers in the profiles indicate the relative percentages, in CD45.1 + or GFP + cells (internal control, Int. cont) (left panels, CD19 vs. Thy1.2) and CD45.1 + Thy1.2 + or GFP + Thy1.2 + cells (right panels, CD4 vs. CD8), for each quadrant or fractions. Results represent at least three independent biological replicates. (B) The efficiencies of the appearance of CD4 + CD8 + (DP) thymocytes derived from control (WT) or Notch1 -deficient (N1KO) BM cells were examined. DP appearance index was calculated as the ratio of CD45.1 + /GFP + DP thymocytes and CD45.1 + /GFP + B220 + B cells in lymph node (mean ± SD; WT as donor; Cont, n=3; D4KO, n=3; iD4/D4KO, n=3; iD1/D4KO, n=4; N1KO as donor; Cont, n=5; D4KO, n=5; iD4/D4KO, n=5; iD1/D4KO, n=5). The data were collected from three independent experiments. Each closed circle indicates the index in each mouse. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Mann–Whitney U -test. " title="... mice with BM cells from Notch1 f/f (WT, CD45.1) or Rosa26 CreERT2 Notch1 f/f (N1KO, CD45.1) mice ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
Figure Legend Snippet: T-cell development from Notch1 -deficient BM cells in the thymus of iD4 and iD1 mice. The primary BM chimeras were prepared in irradiated WT (CD45.2) mice with BM cells from Notch1 f/f (WT, CD45.1) or Rosa26 CreERT2 Notch1 f/f (N1KO, CD45.1) mice and GFP Tg mice. The control and Notch1 -deficient BM cells were obtained from the primary BM chimeras after the administration of tamoxifen and serially transferred into Dll4 f/f (Cont), Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (D4KO), iD4 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD4/D4KO), or iD1 Dll4 f/f FoxN1-Cre (iD1/D4KO) mice. Four weeks after the reconstitution, thymocytes were analyzed ( Supplementary Figure 3B ). (A) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the thymocytes from the secondary BM chimeric mice. Numbers in the profiles indicate the relative percentages, in CD45.1 + or GFP + cells (internal control, Int. cont) (left panels, CD19 vs. Thy1.2) and CD45.1 + Thy1.2 + or GFP + Thy1.2 + cells (right panels, CD4 vs. CD8), for each quadrant or fractions. Results represent at least three independent biological replicates. (B) The efficiencies of the appearance of CD4 + CD8 + (DP) thymocytes derived from control (WT) or Notch1 -deficient (N1KO) BM cells were examined. DP appearance index was calculated as the ratio of CD45.1 + /GFP + DP thymocytes and CD45.1 + /GFP + B220 + B cells in lymph node (mean ± SD; WT as donor; Cont, n=3; D4KO, n=3; iD4/D4KO, n=3; iD1/D4KO, n=4; N1KO as donor; Cont, n=5; D4KO, n=5; iD4/D4KO, n=5; iD1/D4KO, n=5). The data were collected from three independent experiments. Each closed circle indicates the index in each mouse. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Mann–Whitney U -test.
Techniques Used: Irradiation, Derivative Assay, MANN-WHITNEY